A feminist argument against statism: public and private in theories of global justice

Journal of Global Ethics 10 (1):56-70 (2014)

Authors
Angie Pepper
University of Birmingham
Abstract
Cosmopolitanism and statism represent the two dominant liberal theoretical standpoints in the current debate on global distributive justice. In this paper, I will develop a feminist argument that recommends that statist approaches be rejected. This argument has its roots in the feminist critique of liberal theories of social justice. In Justice, Gender, and the Family Susan Moller Okin argues that many liberal egalitarian theories of justice are inadequate because they assume a strict division between public and private spheres. I will argue that this inadequacy is replicated in statist approaches to global justice. To demonstrate this, I will show how an analogue of Okin's critique of Rawls's A Theory of Justice can be extended to his The Law of Peoples. I will conclude that statist theories inevitably assume a strong divide between public and private spheres and that by doing so they allow for situations marked by gross injustice which anyone concerned with the welfare of the world's most vulnerable should find unacceptable.
Keywords cosmopolitanism  statism  feminism  global justice  Okin  Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/17449626.2014.894929
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,902
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Development and Global Ethics: Five Foci for the Future.David A. Crocker - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (3):245-253.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Justice and Injustice Have No Place Outside the Hobbesian State.Johan9 Olsthoorn - 2015 - European Journal of Political Theory 14 (1):19-36.
A Kantian Conception of Global Justice.Helga Varden - 2011 - Review of International Studies 37 (05):2043-2057.
A Feminist Account of Global Responsibility.Sarah Clark Miller - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):391-412.
Justice and Morality Beyond Naïve Cosmopolitanism.Lea Ypi - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):171-192.
Global Migratory Potential and the Scope of Justice.Richard Child - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):282-300.
Feminism, the Public and the Private.Joan B. Landes (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-04-29

Total views
58 ( #156,539 of 2,309,729 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #758,532 of 2,309,729 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature