Cognitive Science 37 (5):800-828 (2013)
AbstractIt is often assumed that graphemes are a crucial level of orthographic representation above letters. Current connectionist models of reading, however, do not address how the mapping from letters to graphemes is learned. One major challenge for computational modeling is therefore developing a model that learns this mapping and can assign the graphemes to linguistically meaningful categories such as the onset, vowel, and coda of a syllable. Here, we present a model that learns to do this in English for strings of any letter length and any number of syllables. The model is evaluated on error rates and further validated on the results of a behavioral experiment designed to examine ambiguities in the processing of graphemes. The results show that the model (a) chooses graphemes from letter strings with a high level of accuracy, even when trained on only a small portion of the English lexicon; (b) chooses a similar set of graphemes as people do in situations where different graphemes can potentially be selected; (c) predicts orthographic effects on segmentation which are found in human data; and (d) can be readily integrated into a full-blown model of multi-syllabic reading aloud such as CDP++ (Perry, Ziegler, & Zorzi, 2010). Altogether, these results suggest that the model provides a plausible hypothesis for the kind of computations that underlie the use of graphemes in skilled reading
Similar books and articles
Psychophysical investigations into the neural basis of synaesthesia.Vilayanur S. Ramachandran & Edward M. Hubbard - 2001 - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 268:979-983.
Simplifying Reading: Applying the Simplicity Principle to Reading.Janet I. Vousden, Michelle R. Ellefson, Jonathan Solity & Nick Chater - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (1):34-78.
Modeling a theory without a model theory, or, computational modeling “after feyerabend”.Arthur M. Jacobs & Jonathan Grainger - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):46-47.
Is Covert attention really unnecessary?Alexander Pollatsek & Keith Rayner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):695-696.
Neural models that convince: Model hierarchies and other strategies to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain.Martijn Meeter, Janneke Jehee & Jaap Murre - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (6):749 – 772.
Methodologies for comparing complex computational models of eye-movement control in reading: Just fitting the data is not enough.Ronan Reilly & Ralph Radach - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):499-500.
Computation, connectionism and modelling the mind.Mary Litch - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (3):357-364.
Dissociation between regular and irregular in connectionist architectures: Two processes, but still no special linguistic rules.Marco Zorzi & Gabriella Vigliocco - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1045-1046.
Introduction to computational cognitive modeling.Ron Sun - 2008 - In The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3--19.
A Computational Modeling Approach on Three‐Digit Number Processing.Stefan Huber, Korbinian Moeller, Hans-Christoph Nuerk & Klaus Willmes - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):317-334.
The e-z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models.Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner & Alexander Pollatsek - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):445-476.
The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology.Ron Sun (ed.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Modeling language and cognition with deep unsupervised learning: a tutorial overview.Marco Zorzi, Alberto Testolin & Ivilin P. Stoianov - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
References found in this work
On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition.Steven Pinker & Alan Prince - 1988 - Cognition 28 (1-2):73-193.
A theory of lexical access in speech production.Willem J. M. Levelt, Ardi Roelofs & Antje S. Meyer - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):1-38.
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Mark S. Seidenberg & James L. McClelland - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (4):523-568.
DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Max Coltheart, Kathleen Rastle, Conrad Perry, Robyn Langdon & Johannes Ziegler - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (1):204-256.
An Integrated Theory of the Mind.John R. Anderson, Daniel Bothell, Michael D. Byrne, Scott Douglass, Christian Lebiere & Yulin Qin - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (4):1036-1060.