Advance Directives and Transformative Experience: Resilience in the Face of Change

American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):69-71 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this commentary, I critique three aspects of Emily Walsh's proposal to reduce the moral and legal weight of advance directives: (1) the ambiguity of its initial thesis, (2) its views about the ethics and legality of clinical practice, and (3) its interpretation and application of Ronald Dworkin’s account of advance directives and L.A. Paul's view on transformative experience. I also consider what Walsh’s proposal would mean for people facing the prospect of dementia. I conclude that our reasons to honor many advance directives survive the move to a transformative experience framework.

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives in Canada.Alister Browne & Bill Sullivan - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (3):256-260.
Précis of Transformative Experience.L. A. Paul - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (3):760-765.
Descendants and advance directives.Christopher Buford - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):217-231.


Added to PP

419 (#40,757)

6 months
124 (#23,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Govind Persad
University of Denver

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Transformative Experience.Laurie Ann Paul - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.
Advance Directives, Dementia, and Physician‐Assisted Death.Paul T. Menzel & Bonnie Steinbock - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (2):484-500.

View all 10 references / Add more references