Do desacordo ao paradoxo epistêmico: uma análise da concepção de serviço de autoridade de Raz à luz da teoria do “ponto-cego” de R. Sorensen

Dissertatio 48:242-257 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Abstract: Using a critical review of the literature, we study a challenge from philosophical anarchism to J. Raz's theory of legal authority: it would be irrational to follow an order with which one disagrees, since it would mean acting against what is considered more justified. Through references from decision theory and epistemology, and deploying examples about tools for assisting in routine decision-making, we sketch two possible answers: first, it may be justifiable to put yourself in a situation that leads to irrationally acting; second, according to the “blindspots” theory, we outline some restrictions from a theory of rationality to the authority.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Answering the Bayesian Challenge.Mark Sargent - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (2):237-252.
Hobbes as a sociobiologist. Rethinking the state of nature.Darat G. Nicole - 2017 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 58 (136):163-183.
Metaethical assumptions of philosophical anarchism.Andrea Luisa Bucchile Faggion - 2020 - Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 19 (1):33–48.


Added to PP

247 (#85,677)

6 months
582 (#2,385)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references