Dissertatio 48:242-257 (2019)

Authors
Abstract
Abstract: Using a critical review of the literature, we study a challenge from philosophical anarchism to J. Raz's theory of legal authority: it would be irrational to follow an order with which one disagrees, since it would mean acting against what is considered more justified. Through references from decision theory and epistemology, and deploying examples about tools for assisting in routine decision-making, we sketch two possible answers: first, it may be justifiable to put yourself in a situation that leads to irrationally acting; second, according to the “blindspots” theory, we outline some restrictions from a theory of rationality to the authority.
Keywords Authority  Rationality  Paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paradoxes of Rationality.Roy Sorensen - 2004 - In Alfred R. Mele & Piers Rawling (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oup Usa.
The Meaning of the Authority of the Bible.Maarten Wisse - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (4):473-487.
Anarchist Education and the Paradox of Pedagogical Authority.Nathan Fretwell - 2019 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (1):55-65.
Merton-Popper’s paradox and the substantive rationality of science.Liana A. Tukhvatulina - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):49-52.
Racionalidade epistêmica e o Paradoxo de Moore.Cláudio de Almeida - 2009 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 54 (2):48-73.
The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox.Roy T. Cook - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):467-482.
O “aparente” Paradoxo Das Regras.Noel Struchiner - 2009 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 8 (3):63-71.
Zagzebski on Authority and Preemption in the Domain of Belief.Arnon Keren - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (4):61-76.
Joseph Raz’s Theory of Authority.Kenneth Ehrenberg - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (12):884-894.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-06-24

Total views
63 ( #156,464 of 2,402,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #35,417 of 2,402,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes