Foundations of Physics 15 (2):201-205 (1985)

Linear combinations of “elements of reality,” as defined by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, may not be themselves “elements of reality.” There are questions which can be formulated (and unambiguously answered) in the ordinary language of experimental physics, but cannot be represented in the mathematical framework of quantum theory in a nontrivial way
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00735292
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,467
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

When Realism Made a Difference: The Constitution of Matter and its Conceptual Enigmas in Late 19th Century Physics.Torsten Wilholt - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (1):1-16.
Quantum Mechanics is Compatible with Realism.M. E. Burgos - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (8):809-812.
Inconsistency of the Copenhagen Interpretation.C. I. J. M. Stuart - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (5):591-622.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
86 ( #118,068 of 2,421,213 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #543,757 of 2,421,213 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes