Bioethics 27 (3):124-131 (2013)
We respond to a number of objections raised by John Harris in this journal to our argument that we should pursue genetic and other biological means of morally enhancing human beings (moral bioenhancement). We claim that human beings now have at their disposal means of wiping out life on Earth and that traditional methods of moral education are probably insufficient to achieve the moral enhancement required to ensure that this will not happen. Hence, we argue, moral bioenhancement should be sought and applied. We argue that cognitive enhancement and technological progress raise acute problems because it is easier to harm than to benefit. We address objections to this argument. We also respond to objections that moral bioenhancement: (1) interferes with freedom; (2) cannot be made to target immoral dispositions precisely; (3) is redundant, since cognitive enhancement by itself suffices
|Keywords||cognitive enhancement moral enhancement altruism freedom value of technology moral bioenhancement enhancement|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement.Robert Sparrow - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):20-28.
Moral Enhancement, Freedom, and What We (Should) Value in Moral Behaviour.D. DeGrazia - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):361-368.
Voluntary Moral Enhancement and the Survival-at-Any-Cost Bias.V. Raki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):246-250.
Should Moral Bioenhancement Be Compulsory? Reply to Vojin Rakic.I. Persson & J. Savulescu - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):251-252.
Moral Enhancement: Do Means Matter Morally?Farah Focquaert & Maartje Schermer - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (2):139-151.
Similar books and articles
The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):162-177.
Moral Enhancement Via Direct Emotion Modulation: A Reply to John Harris.Thomas Douglas - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):160-168.
Moral Transhumanism: The Next Step.M. N. Tennison - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):405-416.
Human Enhancement and Supra-Personal Moral Status.Thomas Douglas - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):473-497.
Bioconservatism, Bioliberalism, and Repugnance.Rebecca Roache & Steve Clarke - 2009 - Monash Bioethics Review 28 (1):04.1-04.21.
Thinking Across Species—a Critical Bioethics Approach to Enhancement.Richard Twine - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Reshaping Human Intelligence: The Debate About Genetic Enhancement of Cognitive Functions.Michael Fuchs - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):165-181.
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
State Neutrality and the Ethics of Human Enhancement Technologies.John Basl - 2010 - AJOB 1 (2):41-48.
Playing God, Playing Adam: The Politics and Ethics of Enhancement. [REVIEW]Joanna Zylinska - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (2):149-161.
Beyond Humanity?: The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement.Allen E. Buchanan - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-07-30
Total downloads185 ( #24,555 of 2,178,232 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #15,206 of 2,178,232 )
How can I increase my downloads?