Hart's Methodological Positivism

Legal Theory 4 (4):427-467 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To understand H.L.A. Hart's general theory of law, it is helpful to distinguish betweensubstantiveandmethodologicallegal positivism. Substantive legal positivism is the view that there is no necessary connection between morality and the content of law. Methodological legal positivism is the view that legal theory can and should offer a normatively neutral description of a particular social phenomenon, namely law. Methodological positivism holds, we might say, not that there is no necessary connection between morality and law, but rather that there is no connection, necessary or otherwise, between morality and legal theory. The respective claims of substantive and methodological positivism are, at least on the surface, logically independent. Hobbes and Bentham employed normative methodologies to defend versions of substantive positivism, and in modern times Michael Moore has developed what can be regarded as a variant of methodological positivism to defend a theory of natural law.

Other Versions

reprint Perry, Stephen R. (2000) "Hart's Methodological Positivism". In Coleman, Jules L., Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to `the Concept of Law', pp. : Oxford University Press UK (2000)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
202 (#124,516)

6 months
23 (#134,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. Perry
University of Pennsylvania

References found in this work

Authority, Law and Morality.Joseph Raz - 1985 - The Monist 68 (3):295-324.

Add more references