Atomists explain properties of wholes as compositions of properties of their parts; in particular properties of complex expressions as composed of properties of their parts. Especially, semantic atomists explain meanings of complex expressions as composed of meanings of their parts. Holists deny themselves this way: they insist that at least in some cases properties of wholes are more basic than, or not reducible to, properties of their parts; in particular, semantic holists claim that meanings of (at least some) wholes are more basic than meanings of parts. Now as atomists have composition as the way of getting themselves from the meanings of parts to the meanings of wholes, holists need something to get them from the meanings of wholes to those of their parts. What is usually invoked in this context is the concept of intersubstitutivity, which is, however, not always wholly clear.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,507

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

47 (#284,862)

6 months
2 (#525,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Formal semantics and logic.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1971 - New York,: Macmillan.
Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic.J. Michael Dunn & Gary M. Hardegree - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):231-234.
Meaning and Structure.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2002 - Filosoficky Casopis 50:686-688.
What is an inference rule?Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern & Moshe Y. Vardi - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):1018-1045.
Language and its Models: Is Model Theory a Theory of Semantics?Jaroslav Peregrin - 1997 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):1-23.

View all 6 references / Add more references