Neuroethics 9 (3):263-268 (2016)

Authors
Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
Abstract
In this paper we reply to the most important objections to our advocacy of moral enhancement by biomedical means – moral bioenhancement – that John Harris advances in his new book How to be Good. These objections are to effect that such moral enhancement undercuts both moral reasoning and freedom. The latter objection is directed more specifically at what we have called the God Machine, a super-duper computer which predicts our decisions and prevents decisions to perpertrate morally atrocious acts. In reply, we argue first that effective moral bioenhancement presupposes moral reasoning rather than undermines it. Secondly, that the God Machine would leave us with extensive freedom and that the restrictions it imposes on it are morally justified by the prevention of harm to victims.
Keywords Moral bioenhancement  Freedom  Reason  Responsibility  Coercion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-016-9268-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Enhancement and Moral Freedom: A Critique of the Little Alex Problem.John Danaher - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 83:233-250.
Moral Neuroenhancement.Brian D. Earp, Thomas Douglas & Julian Savulescu - 2017 - In L. Syd M. Johnson & Karen S. Rommelfanger (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics. Routledge.
Neurofeedback-Based Moral Enhancement and the Notion of Morality.Koji Tachibana - 2017 - The Annals of the University of Bucharest - Philosophy Series 66 (2):25-41.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom and Moral Enhancement.M. J. Selgelid - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):215-216.
Is Moral Bioenhancement Dangerous?Nicholas Drake - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1):3-6.
Moral Enhancement and Mental Freedom.Christoph Bublitz - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):88-106.
Moral Bioenhancement: A Neuroscientific Perspective.M. J. Crockett - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):370-371.
Egalitarianism and Moral Bioenhancement.Robert Sparrow - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (4):20-28.
Moral Perfection and the Demand for Human Enhancement.Adriana Warmbier - forthcoming - Ethics in Progress 2015 (No.1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-07-10

Total views
77 ( #118,753 of 2,324,595 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,297 of 2,324,595 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes