Molinism: The Contemporary Debate

(ed.)
Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Molinism promises the strongest account of God's providence consistent with our freedom. But is it a coherent view, and does it provide a satisfying account of divine providence? The essays in this volume examine the status, defensibility, and application of this recently revived doctrine, and anticipate the future direction of the debate

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,499

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Ken Perszyk.Robert Koons - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (3):345-353.
Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Ken Perszyk.Robert Anderson - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (3):627 - 628.
and Divine Providence.Derk Pereboom - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 262.
Still Another Anti-Molinist Argument.Daniel Rubio - 2024 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 8 (2).
“The (Non)-Existence of Molinist Counterfactuals”.William Hasker - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 25--37.
Anti-Molinist Argument'.Dean Zimmerman - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 140.
Anti-Molinist Argument.William Lane Craig - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Anti-Molinist Arguments.William Hasker - 2011 - In Ken Perszyk, Molinism: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-15

Downloads
87 (#267,722)

6 months
3 (#1,323,969)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Problems of Religious Luck: Assessing the Limits of Reasonable Religious Disagreement.Guy Axtell - 2018 - Lanham, MD, USA & London, UK: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield.
The Thin Red Line, Molinism, and the Flow of Time.Ciro De Florio & Aldo Frigerio - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (3):307-329.
Foreknowledge and Free Will.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:online.
Some Puzzles about Molinist Conditionals.Robert C. Koons - 2022 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (1):137-154.
Does Molinism Reconcile Freedom and Foreknowledge?Justin Mooney - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):131-148.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references