On H. M. Oliver’s “Established Expectations and American Economic Policies”

Ethics 125 (3):829-832, (2015)

Authors
Govind Persad
University of Denver
Abstract
In this retrospective for Ethics, I discuss H.M. Oliver’s “Established Expectations and American Economic Policies.” This article, by a then-modestly-famous economist, has been ignored (no citations) since its 1940 publication. Yet it bears directly on a normative problem at the intersection of ethics and economics that challenges today’s policymakers but has received comparatively little philosophical attention: how should we balance potentially desirable institutional change against the disruption of established expectations? Oliver details how the principle of fulfilling established expectations cuts across political lines. Conservatives, he observes, criticized inflation for disrupting expectations, and demanded the protection of established corporations. New Deal progressives achieved “the safeguarding of the economic positions of certain important sections of the American people” (104) via statutes designed to protect income and homeownership status. And labor leaders lobbied for the preservation of occupational status. Oliver criticizes these demands on two grounds. First, they are noncompossible: they can’t simultaneously be fulfilled. Second, they are economically inefficient. He concludes that “in a modern dynamic economy, the preservation of status is not and cannot be a feasible criterion of economic justice” (107). I argue that Oliver accurately recognizes both the wide endorsement and the moral ill-foundedness of fulfilling expectations. However, I criticize Oliver’s belief in the noncompossibility of expectations. The established expectations of the wealthy, middle-class homeowners and retirees, and current workers can all be maintained, but at the price of constricting the opportunities of new graduates, immigrants, and the poor—all groups yet to develop settled expectations. This insight renders the protection of expectations not merely inefficient but also unjust.
Keywords expectations  intergenerational justice  institutional change  status maintenance  social stratification  mobility
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/679547
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Impact of Economic Globalisation on Health.Meri Koivusalo - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):13-34.
The Economic Nationalism and Its Influence in the Early American History.Xiao-de Wang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:18-26.
Scientific Research and the Public Trust.David B. Resnik - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):399-409.
Stem Cell Research and Economic Promises.Timothy Caulfield - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):303-313.
The Adjustment of Foreign Aid Policy during the First Term of the Eisenhower Presidency.Guo-zhu Liu - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:2-9.
Green Economics.David Pearce - 1992 - Environmental Values 1 (1):3 - 13.
Stages of Economic Development, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Civil Society.Harry J. Van Buren Iii & Jeanne M. Logsdon - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:170-172.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-19

Total views
148 ( #55,165 of 2,285,628 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #42,991 of 2,285,628 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature