Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

The Lancet 373 (9661):423--431 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Allocation of very scarce medical interventions such as organs and vaccines is a persistent ethical challenge. We evaluate eight simple allocation principles that can be classified into four categories: treating people equally, favouring the worst-off, maximising total benefits, and promoting and rewarding social usefulness. No single principle is sufficient to incorporate all morally relevant considerations and therefore individual principles must be combined into multiprinciple allocation systems. We evaluate three systems: the United Network for Organ Sharing points systems, quality-adjusted life-years, and disability-adjusted life-years. We recommend an alternative system—the complete lives system—which prioritises younger people who have not yet lived a complete life, and also incorporates prognosis, save the most lives, lottery, and instrumental value principles

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Complete Lives in the Balance.Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):37 – 45.
Justice and the Macroallocation of Human Donor Organs.Michael James Booker - 1990 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Distributive Justice in Kidney Allocation.T. Schmidt - 2001 - Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):286-298.
Fault and the Allocation of Spare Organs.B. Smart - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):26-30.
The Survival Lottery.John Harris Allocation of Scarce Resources & Quality of Life - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-05

Downloads
12,692 (#146)

6 months
773 (#313)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?