Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):307-311 (2011)

Authors
Ingmar Persson
Oxford University
Abstract
I have earlier argued that, like egalitarianism, prioritarianism is exposed to the levelling down objection—which I do not find serious—but also that it faces related, more serious objections that egalitarianism avoids. In this paper I reply to Thomas Porter’s attempt to rebut this argument. I also trace the more serious objections to prioritarianism to the fact that it implies the desirability of welfare diffusion, i.e. that it is better all things considered if a quantity of welfare is distributed over as many recipients as possible, so that each recipient gets a minimal benefit, and that the outcome would still be in one respect better, even if the quantity of welfare was reduced. In contrast to egalitarianism, prioritarianism therefore implies that it is in one respect better if an equality, or a solitary individual, is located at lower rather than a higher level of welfare
Keywords Egalitarianism  Levelling down objection  Parfit  Porter  Prioritarianism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-010-9242-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,464
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2002 - In Matthew Clayton & Andrew Williams (eds.), The Ideal of Equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 81-125.
Persons, Interests, and Justice.Nils Holtug - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Equality, Priority and Person-Affecting Value.Ingmar Persson - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (1):23-39.
Prioritarianism and the Levelling Down Objection.Thomas Porter - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):197-206.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Persistence of the Leveling Down Objection.Michael Weber - 2019 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):1-25.
Relative Priority.Lara Buchak - forthcoming - Economics and Philosophy:1-31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Prioritarianism and Welfare Reductions.Ingmar Persson - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):289-301.
Equality-Tempered Prioritarianism.Dale Dorsey - 2014 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (1):45-61.
Prioritarianism and the Levelling Down Objection.Thomas Porter - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):197-206.
Equality, Priority or What?Larry S. Temkin - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):61-87.
Equality and Priority.Martin Peterson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2005 - Utilitas 17 (3):299-309.
In Defence of the Priority View.Thomas Porter - 2012 - Utilitas 24 (3):349-364.
Equality, Priority and Global Justice.Nils Holtug - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (3):173 – 179.
Persons, Interests, and Justice.Nils Holtug - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Utilitarianism and Prioritarianism II.David McCarthy - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):1-33.
Two Conceptions of Inequality.Caj Strandberg - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (2):169–199.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-18

Total views
129 ( #91,896 of 2,520,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes