Por que construir uma proposição com coisas? As razões de Gualter Burleigh em 1301

Discurso 40 (40):123-144 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Por que construir uma proposição com coisas? As razões de Gualter Burleigh em 1301

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Burleigh's Paradox.Dale Jacquette - 2007 - Philosophy 82 (3):437-448.
Os anulabilismos de Klein e de Swain e o problema de Gettier.Emerson Carlos Valcarenghi - 2010 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 14 (2):175-200.
Razões expressas para o abandono de tratamento psicoterápico.Fabíola Vargas & Maria Lúcia Tiellet Nunes - 2003 - Aletheia: An International Journal of Philosophy 17:155-158.
On the Philosophical Import of Some Accomplishments of Newton da Costa.Marcel Guillaume - 2011 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 15 (1):7-14.
The "is"-"ought" controversy.Burleigh T. Wilkins - 1970 - Ethics 80 (2):160-164.
Review. [REVIEW]Burleigh T. Wilkins - 1989 - Synthese 78 (3):357-358.
The thing to do?Burleigh Taylor Wilkins - 1965 - Mind 74 (293):89-91.
On Some Consequentiae in Walter Burleigh.Arthur N. Prior - 1953 - New Scholasticism 27 (4):433-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ernesto Perini-Santos
Federal University of Minas Gerais

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rationality and believing the impossible.Ruth Barcan Marcus - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (6):321-338.
Le réalisme propositionnel de Walter Burley.Laurent Cesalli - 2001 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 68 (1):155-221.
Quaestiones super librum Posteriorum (review).Michael W. Tkacz - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (3):392-393.

Add more references