Priority Setting, Cost-Effectiveness, and the Affordable Care Act

American Journal of Law and Medicine 41 (1):119-166 (2015)

Authors
Govind Persad
University of Denver
Abstract
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) may be the most important health law statute in American history, yet much of the most prominent legal scholarship examining it has focused on the merits of the court challenges it has faced rather than delving into the details of its priority-setting provisions. In addition to providing an overview of the ACA’s provisions concerning priority setting and their developing interpretations, this Article attempts to defend three substantive propositions. First, I argue that the ACA is neither uniformly hostile nor uniformly friendly to efforts to set priorities in ways that promote cost and quality. Second, I argue that the ACA does not take a single, unified approach to priority setting; rather, its guidance varies depending on the aspect of the health care system at issue (Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Medicare, essential health benefits) and the factors being excluded from priority setting (age, disability, life expectancy). Third, I argue that cost-effectiveness can be achieved within the ACA's constraints, but that doing so will require adopting new approaches to cost-effectiveness and priority setting. By limiting the use of standard cost-effectiveness analysis, the ACA makes the need for workable rivals to cost-effectiveness analysis a pressing practical concern rather than a mere theoretical worry.
Keywords cost-effectiveness  priority setting  QALY  DALY  Affordable Care Act  health insurance  disability  age
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Priority Setting and Evidence Based Purchasing.Lucy Frith - 1999 - Health Care Analysis 7 (2):139-151.
Impartiality and Disability Discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
Who Should Manage Care? The Case for Providers.John D. Stobo - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):387-389.
Cost‐Effectiveness of Pharmacotherapy for COPD in Ambulatory Care: A Review.Steven Simoens - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (6):1004-1011.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-05

Total views
130 ( #51,758 of 2,319,738 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #49,014 of 2,319,738 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature