Prolegomena to a theory of disability, inability and handicap

Underlying the political activism that led to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was what Ron Amundson has called the environmental conception of disability[1]. In [7] we called this the circumstantial conception of disability and handicap, and contrasted it with the intrinsic conception. We use disability to mean loss of a function, such as moving the hands or seeing, that is part of the standard repertoire for humans. Handicap is a species of inability, in particular, the inability to do something that one wants to do and most others around one can do.1 The intrinsic conception imagines a tight connection between disability and handicap; the circumstantial conception loosens and relativizes that connection. The circumstantial conception reminds us that we all depend on various tools and structures—in particular, on cultural artifacts—to enable us to do what we want to do. In many cases it is the design of these tools and structures that prevents a disabled person from accomplishing what they want, rather than anything intrinsically connected to the disability. For example, very few people..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,785
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

(In) Equality, (Ab) Normality, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.Anita Silvers - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (2):209-224.
On a Bioethical Challenge to Disability Rights.Ron Amundson & Shari Tresky - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):541 – 561.
Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Mark Greene & Steven Augello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
Impairment, Disability and Handicap--Old Fashioned Concepts?R. B. Jones - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):377-379.
Disability, Handicap, and the Environment.Ron Amundson - 1992 - Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1):105-119.
Genetically Based Handicap.Alan Holland - 1998 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):119–132.
Disability, Minority, and Difference.Elizabeth Barnes - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):337-355.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #328,616 of 2,243,856 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,041,984 of 2,243,856 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature