Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):251-252 (2014)

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University
In his challenging paper,1 Vojin Rakic argues against our claim that ‘there are strong reasons to believe’ that moral bioenhancement should be obligatory or compulsory if it can be made safe and effective.2 Rakic starts by criticising an argument that we employed against John Harris.3 ,4 In this argument we maintain, among other things, that moral bioenhancement cannot be wholly effective if our will is free in what is called an ‘indeterministic’ or ‘contra-causal sense’; that is, if our choices are not fully determined by our biology and environmental circumstances. Rakic contends that we ‘do not take into account the possibility that we can have an entirely free will that does not limit the effectiveness of moral bio-enhancement’. We can use ‘our freedom to decide to be morally bio-enhanced’.In reply, we would like to insist that if our freedom is freedom in this indeterministic sense, we cannot use this freedom to decide to subject ourselves to effective moral bioenhancement, since this effectiveness presupposes that our will is fully determined by biological causes that this enhancement influences. If certain sub-atomic processes are indeterministic, probabilistic, we cannot make them deterministic. We cannot change the laws …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2013-101423
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,118
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Art of Misunderstanding Moral Bioenhancement.Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (1):48-57.
Moral Neuroenhancement.Brian D. Earp, Thomas Douglas & Julian Savulescu - 2017 - In L. Syd M. Johnson & Karen S. Rommelfanger (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics. Routledge.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Voluntary Moral Enhancement and the Survival-at-Any-Cost Bias.V. Raki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (4):246-250.
A Theory of the Normative Will.Vojin Rakić - 2010 - Faculty of Economics and Political Science.
Aktuelna debata:(K+ M) P i konačna šteta.Vojin Rakić - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):87-96.
Integrisanje Kognitivnog I Moralnog Poboljšanja.Vojin Rakić - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Budućnost Morala I Međunarodna Pravda.Vojin Rakić - 2010 - Filozofija I Društvo 21 (1):19-30.
Integration of Cognitive and Moral Enhancement.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):91-103.
Philosophy for Public Good.Vojin Rakić - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (3):271-276.
Bioethics in Serbia: Institutions in Need of Philosophical Debate.Vojin Rakić & Petar Bojanić - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (3):440-448.
The Current Debate:(C+ M) E and Ultimate Harm.Vojin Rakic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (4):87-96.
History and Future of Justice.Vojin Rakić - 2004 - Fakultet Organizacionih Nauka.


Added to PP index

Total views
44 ( #211,591 of 2,324,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #682,670 of 2,324,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes