Thru but not wisht: Language, writing, and universal reading theory

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):299-300 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Languages may get the writing system they deserve or merely a writing system they can live with – adaption without optimization. A universal theory of reading reflects the general dependence of writing on language and the adaptations required by the demands of specific languages and their written forms. The theory also can be informed by research that addresses a specific language and orthography, gaining universality through demonstrating adaptations to language and writing input

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger en het geschreven woord.S. IJsseling - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (2):195 - 213.
Broken Words: Maurice Blanchot and the Impossibility of Writing.Walter Brogan - 2009 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 1 (2):181-192.
On Juren Habermas’s Misinterpretation of J.L. Austin.Aydan Turanl - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:237-243.
Reading Kemple reading Marx writing.Ned Jackson - 1998 - History and Theory 37 (1):124–138.
Reading/writing between the lines.Gail Weiss - 1998 - Continental Philosophy Review 31 (4):387-409.
Inside the Concept: Rethinking Dōgen's Language.Rein Raud - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (2):123 - 137.
Poulou's family romance and the book.Anne-Marie Picard - 2001 - Sartre Studies International 7 (2):76-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
15 (#700,103)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references