The Confirmation of Mathematics and its Relationship to Science

Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison (1994)

Authors
Anthony F. Peressini
Marquette University
Abstract
How are mathematical theories and statements confirmed? This is the central question of my dissertation. The received view, the Quine/Putnam indispensability account, views science as holding the key to the confirmation of mathematics. The influence of the Quine/Putnam indispensability approach cannot be overstated; however, new and important doubts are being raised concerning its efficacy. The first part of my dissertation is directed toward the Quine/Putnam indispensability account. I examine the approach and recent critiques of it and offer my own critique, which turns on a distinction between pure and applied mathematics. ;In the second part, I attempt to take a fresh look at the issue of the confirmation of mathematics. I break the problem into two parts: the confirmation of individual mathematical statements relative to a body of accepted formal theory, and the confirmation of the mathematical theory as a whole. The paradigm case of the first, relative kind of mathematical confirmation is mathematical proof. I argue that a reliability condition inspired by the reliability theory of knowledge provides a framework that helps make sense of the epistemological priority given proof. ;In considering the confirmation of a mathematical theory as a whole, I draw on a van Fraasen-like distinction between accepting the adequacy of a theory and believing the truth of a theory. An important question is under what circumstances are we justified in moving beyond the acceptance of a theory to belief in its truth. I argue that the prospects for justifying this move are worse in mathematics than they are in science
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,792
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Applying Pure Mathematics.Anthony F. Peressini - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):13.
Defending the Indispensability Argument: Atoms, Infinity and the Continuum.Eduardo Castro - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):41-61.
From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Confirmation Theory and Confirmation Logic.Chao-Tien Lin - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Mathematics, Time, and Confirmation.Ulrich Meyer - 2001 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Numbers Without Science.Russell Marcus - 2007 - Dissertation, The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York
Confirmation Theory and Indispensability.Mark Colyvan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (1):1-19.
Indispensability and Holism.Jacob Busch - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):47-59.
What Is the Point of Confirmation?Franz Huber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-05

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes