The neuron doctrine in psychiatry

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):846-847 (1999)
Abstract
Gold & Stoljar's target article is important because it shows the limitations of neurobiological theories of the mind more powerfully than previous philosophical criticisms, especially those that focus on the subjective nature of experience and those that use considerations from philosophy of language to argue for the holism of the mental. They use less controversial assumptions and clearer arguments, the conclusions of which are applicable to the whole of neuroscience. Their conclusions can be applied to psychiatry to argue that, contrary to many researchers' assumptions, the approaches to both understanding and treating mental disorders must be interdisciplinary.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99422198
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,182
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
How Trivial is the “Trivial Neuron Doctrine”?Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
A More Substantive Neuron Doctrine.Joe Y. F. Lau - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.
Why Biological Neuroscience Cannot Replace Psychology.Nick Chater - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-834.
Interpreting Neuroscience and Explaining the Mind.Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
The “Trivial Neuron Doctrine” is Not Trivial.Dale Jamieson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):841-842.
Neuron Doctrine: Trivial Versus Radical Versus Do Not Dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

18 ( #271,884 of 2,172,024 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,024 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums