What Are Data Good for Anyway?

Social Theory and Practice 46 (2):339-364 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article develops a typology of usages for empirical data in normative theorizing in ‎contemporary political theory. A typology of usages is indicated, providing definitions, ‘names’ and an analysis for each ‎usage, and points to the typical stage within political theory research for each usage. The typology is built in a casuistic methodology. It includes the following categories: Spotlighting, Definition, ‎‎ Conversion, Institutional clarity, Theoretical clarity, and Theory improvement. The typology creates a novel toolbox that can be adopted by political theorists; and it clarifies the methods and achievements of data-sensitive political theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good Data.Angela Daly, Monique Mann & S. Kate Devitt - 2019 - Amsterdam, Netherlands: Institute of Network Cultures.
Theory Assessment and Coherence.Peter Brössel - 2008 - Abstracta 4 (1):57-71.
Objective data sets in qualitative research.Julie Zahle - 2020 - Synthese 199 (1-2):101-117.
The Bioethical Underpinnings of Advance Directives.Yvonne Johnson - 2009 - Ethics and Social Welfare 3 (1):32-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-04

Downloads
12 (#1,025,624)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Normative behaviourism: groups it cannot reach?Simon Stevens - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references