Critical Horizons 16 (3):280-298 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
The main goal of critical social justice is to ensure the agency of citizens, which enables them to take part, not only in public discussions about how resources are distributed, but also about matters such as what should be produced, how to do it and through what kind of production, among others. Critical social justice can be best formulated within the foundation programme of discursive ethics, in particular within Apel's version specified in his principle of co-responsibility. This principle establishes a telos that operates as a normative guide to formulate the constructive question about which the necessary conditions are for someone to be able to become a subject of dialogue. Answering this question leads, on the one hand, to the development of some constitutive elements of critical social justice and, on the other hand, to the identification of the social relations and structures that undermine the possibilities of a person to effectively participate in the discussion of the topics they consider relevant. As its constitutive elements, I propose reciprocal recognition autonomy, the metric of capabilities and a sufficientarian principle of justice, which work together with the well-known difference principle. These elements constitute a normative net that allows contemporary societies to be criticized from the perspective of justice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000052
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is the Point of Equality?Elizabeth Anderson - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
Two Kinds of Respect.Stephen Darwall - 1977 - Ethics 88 (1):36-49.
Equality as a Moral Ideal.Harry Frankfurt - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):21-43.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Teaching Business Ethics Through Meditation.Paul G. La Forge - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1283-1295.
Principios de Equidad Discursiva.Ricardo Maliandi - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:83-93.
Critical Comments on Experimental, Discursive, and General Social Psychology.Gustav Jahoda - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (3):341-360.
Community Building in Social Justice Work: A Critical Approach.Silvia Cristina Bettez & Kathy Hytten - 2013 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 49 (1):45-66.
Dialogic Pedagogy for Social Justice: A Critical Examination.Liz Jackson - 2008 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (2-3):137-148.
The Siren Song of Substantivalism.Rom Harré - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (4):466-473.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
8 ( #946,162 of 2,410,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,207 of 2,410,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes