Filosofia Unisinos 18 (1) (2017)

Authors
Abstract
This dialogue between Achilles and the Tortoise – in the spirit of those of Carroll and Hofstadter – argues against the idea, identified with the “traditional” interpretation of Aristotle’s “sea battle argument”, that future contingents are an exception to the Principle of Bivalence. It presents examples of correct everyday predictions, without which one would not be able to decide and to act; however, doing this is incompatible with the belief that the content of these predictions lacks a truth-value. The cost of using a non-classical logic to cope with that may be too high for Stagirite’s defenders, and they would still need to explain why our ordinary predictions seem to have a binary truth-value. In the end, the paper suggests that the problem of future contingents – and of free will – is not a logical problem at all, but rather a limit on what an agent can believe before taking a decision.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4013/fsu.2017.181.08
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael DUMMETT - 1991 - Harvard University Press.
Justice for Hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Past, Present and Future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Clarendon Press.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - Oxford University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Achilles Need Not Catch the Tortoise.Takuo Aoyama - 2010 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 43 (2):81-94.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2017 - Philosophical Investigations 40 (1):31-39.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2016 - Philosophical Investigations 39 (4).
Phoenix's Speech – is Achilles Punished?Naoko Yamagata - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (01):1-.
Phoenix's Speech – is Achilles Punished?Naoko Yamagata - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (1):1-15.
Achilles, the Tortoise, and Colliding Balls.Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson - 2008 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):187 - 201.
The Offer to Achilles1.E. Williams - 1957 - Classical Quarterly 7 (1-2):103-108.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-12-22

Total views
44 ( #235,376 of 2,432,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,307 of 2,432,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes