Philosophia 38 (1):69-105 (2010)
Descartes famously endorsed the view that (CD) God freely created the eternal truths, such that He could have done otherwise than He did. This controversial doctrine is much discussed in recent secondary literature, yet Descartes’s actual arguments for CD have received very little attention. In this paper I focus on what many take to be a key Cartesian argument for CD: that divine simplicity entails the dependence of the eternal truths on the divine will. What makes this argument both important and interesting is that Descartes’s scholastic predecessors share the premise of divine simplicity but reject the CD conclusion. To properly understand Descartes, then, we must determine precisely where he diverges from his predecessors on the path from simplicity to CD. And when we do so we obtain a very surprising result: that despite many dramatic prima facie differences, there is no substantive difference between the relevant doctrines of Descartes and the scholastics . Or so I argue.
|Keywords||Descartes Eternal truths Scholastics Divine simplicity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza's Ethics.Edwin M. Curley - 1988 - Princeton University Press.
Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths.Harry Frankfurt - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (1):36-57.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Descartes, Eternal Truths, and the Divine Omnipotence.Amos Funkenstein - 1975 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 6 (3):185-199.
Infimus Gradus Libertatis? Descartes on Indifference and Divine Freedom.Dan Kaufman - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):391-406.
Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths in Descartes.Dan Kaufman - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (4):553 – 579.
Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom.C. P. Ragland - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):159-188.
Cartesian Causation: Body-Body Interaction, Motion, and Eternal Truths.M. T. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):737-762.
Descartes, Conceivability, and Logical Modality.Lilli Alanen - 1991 - In Tamara Horowitz (ed.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield.
What is at Stake in the Cartesian Debates on the Eternal Truths?Patricia Easton - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (2):348-362.
Added to index2009-05-02
Total downloads128 ( #36,186 of 2,152,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,806 of 2,152,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?