A comparison between monoidal and substructural logics

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 26 (2):126-159 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Monoidal logics were introduced as a foundational framework to analyse the proof theory of deontic logic. Building on Lambek’s work in categorical logic, logical systems are defined as deductive systems, that is, as collections of equivalence classes of proofs satisfying specific rules and axiom schemata. This approach enables the classification of deductive systems with respect to their categorical structure. When looking at their proof theory, however, one can see that there are similarities between monoidal and substructural logics. The purpose of the present paper is to address this issue and highlight the differences between these two approaches. We argue that monoidal logics provide a more flexible foundational framework that enables a finer analysis of the relationship between negation and other logical connectives. We show that the elimination of double negation is independent from the de Morgan dualities, that monoidal deductive systems are not necessarily weakly distributive and that deduc...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Substructural Fuzzy Logics.George Metcalfe & Franco Montagna - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):834 - 864.
Modal translations in substructural logics.Kosta Došen - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (3):283 - 336.
An Algebraic Approach to the Disjunction Property of Substructural Logics.Daisuke Souma - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (4):489-495.
Synthesized substructural logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (3):219-225.
The method of hypersequents in the proof theory of propositional non-classical logics.Arnon Avron - 1977 - In Wilfrid Hodges (ed.), Logic. New York: Penguin Books. pp. 1-32.
Substructural epistemic logics.Igor Sedlár - 2015 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 25 (3):256-285.
Current Trends in Substructural Logics.Katalin Bimbó - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):609-624.
Glivenko theorems revisited.Hiroakira Ono - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2):246-250.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
26 (#629,867)

6 months
7 (#491,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clayton Peterson
Université de Montréal

Citations of this work

Studies in the logic of K -onfirmation.Clayton Peterson - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (2):437-471.
Monoidal logics: completeness and classical systems.Clayton Peterson - 2019 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 29 (2):121-151.

Add more citations