Apology, Reparations, and the Question of Inherited Guilt

Public Affairs Quarterly 17 (4):319-348 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper addresses the question of the appropriateness of a Congressional apology for American slavery. After offering an account of what an apology entails, I consider the claim that today's Congress fails to stand in the right relation to the guilt of American slavery to apologize for it. I argue that, while the current Congress and the constituency it represents do not bear a guilt that would permit it to apologize FOR slavery, it has inherited a guilt RELATED TO slavery for which it is appropriate for it to apologize.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,203

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
77 (#225,659)

6 months
10 (#586,498)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Glen Pettigrove
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race.Naomi Zack (ed.) - 2017 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press USA.
“Screw you!” & “thank you”.Coleen Macnamara - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):893-914.
Official apologies as reparations for dirty hands.Christina Nick - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.
Reconciliation.Linda Radzik & Colleen Murphy - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Punishing the Oppressed and the Standing to Blame.Andy Engen - 2020 - Res Philosophica 97 (2):271-295.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references