Michael L. Peterson (ed.)
Blackwell (2003)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
| Keywords | Religion Philosophy Christianity Philosophy |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2004, 2008 |
| Buy this book | $1.89 used $42.32 new $49.75 from Amazon Amazon page |
| Call number | BL51.C63682 2004 |
| ISBN(s) | 9780470700457 9780631200437 9780631200420 9780631200437 0631200436 0631200428 1119028450 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
Chapters BETA
Grounds for Belief in God Aside, Does Evil Make Atheism More Reasonable Than Theism?Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Two Solutions to the Problem of Divine Hiddenness.Andrew Cullison - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):119 - 134.
Mutual Epistemic Dependence and the Demographic Divine Hiddenness Problem.Max Baker-Hytch - 2016 - Religious Studies 52 (3):375-394.
Partnership with God: A Partial Solution to the Problem of Petitionary Prayer.Nicholas D. Smith & Andrew C. Yip - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (3):395-410.
View all 8 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Reply to Rowe.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
It is Not Rational to Believe in the Resurrection.Michael Martin - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 174--84.
It Is Not Reasonable to Believe That Only One Religion Is True.”.Peter Byrne - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 201--210.
Libertarian Free Will: Contemporary Debates, Ed. David Palmer. [REVIEW]Allison Krile Thornton - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (2):239-245.
Issues in Religion and Education: Whose Religion?Lori G. Beaman & Leo Van Arragon (eds.) - 2015 - Brill.
Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind (Contemporary Debates in Philosophy). Edited by Brian P. McLaughlin and Jonathan Cohen.R. W. Fischer - 2011 - Heythrop Journal 52 (2):338-338.
The Study of Religion After Davidson and Rorty.Nancy Frankenberry - 2014 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 35 (3):195-210.
Do Mystics See God?Evan Fales - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 145--148.
Reply to Moser.”.J. Schellenberg - 2004 - In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell. pp. 54--56.
Rejoinder to Zimmerman.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2004 - In Michael Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell.
Explorations in Contemporary Continental Philosophy of Religion.Deane-Peter Baker & Patrick Maxwell (eds.) - 2003 - Rodopi.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
135 ( #86,380 of 2,504,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,306 of 2,504,869 )
2009-01-28
Total views
135 ( #86,380 of 2,504,869 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,306 of 2,504,869 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
