Philo 9 (2):221-229 (2006)
Arthur Falk has proposed a new construal of faith according to which it is not a mere species of belief, but has essential components in action. This twist on faith promises to resurrect Pascal’s Wager, making faith compatible with reason by believing as the scientist but acting as the theist. I argue that Falk’s proposal leaves religious faith in no better shape; in particular, it merely reframes the question in terms of rational desires rather than rational beliefs.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Daniel Garber: What Happens After Pascal's Wager: Living Faith and Rational Belief. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Burns - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):218-220.
Wagering Belief: Examining Two Objections to Pascal's Wager.D. Groothuis - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):479 - 486.
The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion.J. L. Schellenberg - 2009 - Cornell University Press.
Two Caricatures, I: Pascal's Wager. [REVIEW]James Franklin - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):109 - 114.
A Pascal-Type Justification of Faith in a Scientific Age.Arthur Falk - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (4):543-563.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #103,732 of 2,163,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?