Construing Sen on commitment

Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):15-32 (2005)
Abstract
Why does Sen maintain that people are capable of putting their own goals offline and deliberating and acting out of sheer commitment to others? How can he endorse such a rejection of the belief-desire model of agency? The paper canvasses three explanations and favors one that ascribes an unusual position to Sen: the belief that so far as agents remain in the belief-desire mould, they cannot deliberate on the basis of reasons other than those that derive from standing goals that form an integrated system. What he thinks of as deliberation on the basis of commitment is just the sort of deliberation that involves the formation of a novel, perhaps occasion-specific goal in which the good of another is prioritised.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0266267104000367
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,836
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Collective Intention, Social Identity, and Rational Choice.Jelle de Boer - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):169-184.
Identity, Commitment and Morality.Herlinde Pauer‐Studer - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (3):349-369.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
47 ( #125,732 of 2,231,661 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #190,811 of 2,231,661 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature