Definition and Concept. Aristotelian Definition Vindicated

Studia Neoaristotelica 5 (1):3-37 (2008)
Definition and Concept (Aristotelian Definition Vindicated)The modern (Russellian) theory of definition conceives definitions as abbreviations, so that the question of adequateness (let alone of truth-value) of definitions becomes meaningless. In this paper we show that beside Russellian conception of definitions understood as abbreviations, there is an Aristotelian conception, which exploits the notion of essence and that this conception can be rehabilitated from the standpoint of the modern logic (in particular by means of Pavel Tichý’s Transparent Intensional Logic). Also Carnap’s ‘explication’ indicates that what we feel to be a definition is frequently distinct from a Russellian definition.De definitione et conceptu seu definitionis Aristotelicae vindicatioSecundum modernorum (praecipue B. Russellii) de definitione doctrinam definitio nihil aliud est quam compendium seu abbreviatio; qua de causa quaestio circa talis definitionis adaequationem (ne dicam veritatem) omnem perdidit sensum. Nos tamen, ipsam Aristotelis de definitione doctrinam pro fundamento sumentes, ostendere conamur, Aristotelico-scholasticam conceptionem, in qua definitio ut ipsae obiecti essentiae declaratio intelligitur, restitui posse. Ad hoc munus perficiendum systema quoddam logicum quod Transparens intensionalis logica dicitur adhibemus. Ita manifestatur, ne moderna quidem in logica definitionem Aristotelicam esse reiciendam. Indigentia definitionum, quorum “definiendum” non sit merum compendium propria significatione carens et brevitatis causa de novo pro “definiente” introductum, etiam ex notione “explicationis” a R. Carnapio adhibita satis clare patuit. Translatio: L. Novák
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1214-8407
DOI 10.5840/studneoar20085111
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,433
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

42 ( #115,299 of 1,924,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #212,000 of 1,924,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.