Depoliticizing Democracy

Ratio Juris 17 (1):52-65 (2004)

Authors
Philip Pettit
Australian National University
Abstract
It is now widely accepted as an ideal that democracy should be as deliberative as possible. Democracy should not involve a tussle between different interest groups or lobbies in which the numbers matter more than the arguments. And it should not be a system in which the only arguments that matter are those that voters conduct in an attempt to determine where their private or sectional advantage lies. Democracy, it is said, should promote public deliberation among citizens and authorities as to what does best for the society as a whole and should elicit decision-making on that basis. But the ideal of deliberative democracy has two components—the deliberative and the democratic—and often they pull apart. In this paper I look in the first section at a series of problems that arise on the deliberative front, arguing that their resolution requires various degrees of depoliticization. And then I ask in the second whether the depoliticizing responses that those problems require are antithetical to the ideal of democracy. I argue that they are not in tension with the ideal, if that ideal is cast in the relatively revisionary, two-dimensional form that I favour.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00254.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,865
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):415-419.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Democracy Without Shortcuts.Cristina Lafont - 2019 - Constellations 26 (3):355-360.
The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.Patchen Markell - 2008 - Political Theory 36 (1):9-36.
Epistemic Democracy and the Role of Experts.Cathrine Holst & Anders Molander - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory:1-21.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Complexity and Deliberative Democracy.Joseph Femia - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (3 & 4):359 – 397.
A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy.Thom Brooks - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy.M. Bacon - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1075-1091.
Social Choice Theory and Deliberative Democracy: A Reconciliation.Christian List & John Dryzek - 2003 - British Journal of Political Science 33 (1):1-28.
Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro's The State of Democratic Theory.James Fishkin - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience.William Smith - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):353-377.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-11

Total views
89 ( #91,378 of 2,266,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #598,676 of 2,266,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature