Human thinking, shared intentionality, and egocentric biases

Biology and Philosophy 30 (6):1-16 (2015)

Authors
Uwe Peters
KU Leuven
Abstract
The paper briefly summarises and critiques Tomasello’s A Natural History of Human Thinking. After offering an overview of the book, the paper focusses on one particular part of Tomasello’s proposal on the evolution of uniquely human thinking and raises two points of criticism against it. One of them concerns his notion of thinking. The other pertains to empirical findings on egocentric biases in communication
Keywords Human thinking  Shared intentionality  Explicit versus implicit  Egocentric bias
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-015-9512-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition.M. Tomasello - 1999 - Harvard University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aid and Bias.Keith Horton - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (6):545 – 561.
Thinking About Consequences.Jonathan Baron - 1990 - Journal of Moral Education 19 (2):77-87.
Explicit Representations in Hypothetical Thinking.Jonathan St B. T. Evans & David E. Over - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):763-764.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-01

Total views
114 ( #59,765 of 2,318,363 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #23,628 of 2,318,363 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature