‘I am not what I am’: Paradox and indirect communication – the case of the comic god and the dramaturgical self

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1386/ejpc.1.2.225_1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,359
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Introduction: Paradox and Communication.Peter Murphy - 2010 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 1 (2):153-160.
Darwin the Writer.George Lewis Levine - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
God & the Modern World.Julia Watkin - 2005 - Marquette University Press.
How Indirect Can Indirect Utilitarianism Be?Eric Wiland - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):275-301.
Illusion and Satire in Kierkegaard's Postscript.John Lippitt - 1999 - Continental Philosophy Review 32 (4):451-466.
To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total downloads
18 ( #304,781 of 2,225,164 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #250,407 of 2,225,164 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature