Philosophical Psychology 33 (4):511-548 (2020)

Authors
Uwe Peters
University of Southern Denmark
Abstract
Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international sample of 794 subjects in philosophy. We found that survey participants clearly leaned left (75%), while right-leaning individuals (14%) and moderates (11%) were underrepresented. Moreover, and strikingly, across the political spectrum, from very left-leaning individuals and moderates to very right-leaning individuals, participants reported experiencing ideological hostility in the field, occasionally even from those from their own side of the political spectrum. Finally, while about half of the subjects believed that discrimination against left- or right-leaning individuals in the field is not justified, a significant minority displayed an explicit willingness to discriminate against colleagues with the opposite ideology. Our findings are both surprising and important, because a commitment to tolerance and equality is widespread in philosophy, and there is reason to think that ideological similarity, hostility, and discrimination undermine reliable belief formation in many areas of the discipline.
Keywords ideological diversity  hostility  discrimination  bias
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axy079.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ideological Diversity and Cognitive Difficulties.Bogdan-Constantin Mihailescu & Silviu-Petru Grecu - 2018 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 10 (2):540-567.
Equality, Justice and Legitimacy in Selection.Matthew Clayton - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):8-30.
Confronting the Chimera of a 'Post‐Ideological' Age.Michael Freeden - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):247-262.
The Badness of Discrimination.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):167-185.
Is de filosofie te links?Andreas De Block & Olivier Lemeire - 2017 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 109 (1):105-122.
Left-Libertarianism and Private Discrimination.Peter Vallentyne - 2006 - San Diego Law Review 43:981-994.
Discrimination and Collaboration in Science.Hannah Rubin & Cailin O’Connor - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (3):380-402.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-23

Total views
7,242 ( #159 of 2,340,247 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1,201 ( #135 of 2,340,247 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes