Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):389-390 (1999)
Although some types of cognition may not affect early vision, there is ample evidence that other types of cognition do. Evidence indicating that early vision is penetrable by direct manipulation of viewers' perceptual intentions and by knowledge of the structure of familiar objects is reviewed, and related to both the Pylyshyn target article and Fodor (1983).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
No Reconstruction, No Impenetrability (at Least Not Much) A Commentary on ``Is Vision Continuous with Cognition?'' by Z. Pylyshyn.Shimon Edelman - unknown
Cognitive Impenetrability of Early Vision Does Not Imply Cognitive Impenetrability of Perception.Cathleen M. Moore - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):385-386.
Vision and Cognition: How Do They Connect?Zenon Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):401-414.
The Case for Cognitive Penetrability.Philippe G. Schyns - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):394-395.
Color Memory Penetrates Early Vision.James A. Schirillo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):393-393.
Is Early Visual Processing Attention Impenetrable?Su-Ling Yeh & I.-Ping Chen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):400-400.
Is Vision Continuous with Cognition? The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):341-365.
Reentrant Neural Pathways and the Theory-Ladenness of Perception.Athanassios Raftopoulos - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S187-S199.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #704,600 of 2,178,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?