Philosophia 35 (3-4):273-288 (2007)
This essay compares and contrasts nine different conceptual models of God: atheism, agnosticism, deism, theism, pantheism, polytheism, henotheism, panentheism, and eschatological panentheism. This essay justifies employment of the model method in theology based on commitments within philosophical hermeneutics, philosophy of science, and the theological understanding of divine transcendence. The result is an array of conceptual models of the divine which have reference, but which make indirect rather than literal claims. Of the analyzed models, this essay defends “eschatological panentheism” as the most satisfying model for Christian constructive theology. This paper was delivered during the APA Pacific 2007 Mini-Conference on Models of God
|Keywords||Models of God Panentheism Eschatological panentheism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
An Environment Friendly God: Response to Nancy Hudson's “Divine Immanence”. [REVIEW]Robert S. Gall - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):357-360.
The Descriptive Criterion and Models of God-Modeling: Response to Hustwit's “Can Models of God Compete?”.Samuel Ruhmkorff - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):441-444.
Hartshorne's Dipolar Theism and the Mystery of God.Donald Wayne Viney - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):341-350.
Behind, Between, and Beyond Anthropomorphic Models of Ultimate Reality.Wesley J. Wildman - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):407-425.
Response to Wesley J. Wildman's “Behind, Between, and Beyond Anthropomorphic Models of Ultimate Reality”.Andrew Jerome Dell’Olio - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):427-432.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #70,404 of 2,163,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?