Authors
Dean Pettit
University of North Carolina (System)
Abstract
How do we know what other speakers say? Perhaps the most natural view is that we hear a speaker's utterance and infer what was said, drawing on our competence in the syntax and semantics of the language. An alternative view that has emerged in the literature is that native speakers have a non-inferential capacity to perceive the content of speech. Call this the perceptual view. The disagreement here is best understood as an epistemological one about whether our knowledge of what speakers say is epistemically mediated by our linguistic competence. The present paper takes up the question of how we should go about settling this issue. Arguments for the perceptual view generally appeal to the phenomenology of speech comprehension. The present paper develops a line of argument for the perceptual view that draws on evidence from empirical psychology. The evidence suggests that a speaker's core syntactic and semantic competence is typically deployed sub-personally (e.g., by something like a module). The point is not just that the competence is tacit or unconscious, but that the person is not the locus of the competence. I argue that standing competence can enter into the grounds for knowledge only if it is subject to a certain sort of epistemic assessment, an assessment that is appropriate only if the person is the locus of that competence. If the person is not the locus of a speaker's core linguistic competence, as the psychological evidence suggests, then that competence does not enter into the grounds for our knowledge of what speakers say. If this line of argument is right, it has implications for the epistemology of perception and for our understanding of how empirical psychology bears on epistemology generally.
Keywords meaning  understanding  epistemology of testimony  epistemology  perception  speech perception  speech comprehension  knowledge of language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.4148/biyclc.v5i0.286
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Content Preservation.Tyler Burge - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):457.
Semantic Theory and Tacit Knowledge.Gareth Evans - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing About Language. Routledge.
What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered.Fiona Cowie - 1998 - Oxford University Press USA.
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use.Norbert Hornstein - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (4):567-573.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On What We Experience When We Hear People Speak.Anders Nes - 2016 - Phenomenology and Mind 10:58-85.
Analogical Cognition: An Insight Into Word Meaning.Timothy Pritchard - 2019 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10 (3):587-607.
Understanding as Knowledge of Meaning.Alex Barber - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):964-977.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Epistemology and Psychology of Speech Comprehension.Dean Pettit - unknown - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5:9.
Comprehending Speech.Guy Longworth - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):339-373.
Lexical Norms, Language Comprehension, and the Epistemology of Testimony.Endre Begby - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (3-4):324-342.
Should Analytic Epistemology Be Replaced By Ameliorative Psychology?Mark McEvoy - 2007 - Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):163-171.
Inner Speech, Imagined Speech, and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.Daniel Gregory - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (3):653-673.
An Exploratory Study in the Psychology of Speech Reception.J. Bucklew Jr - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 (6):473.
Judicial Epistemology of Free Speech Through Ancient Lenses.Uladzislau Belavusau - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (2):165-183.
Macrophonic Speech.E. W. Scripture - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (6):784.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
163 ( #55,344 of 2,348,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,197 of 2,348,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes