Pure Epistemic Proceduralism


Authors
Fabienne Peter
University of Warwick
Abstract
In this paper I defend a pure proceduralist conception of legitimacy that applies to epistemic democracy. This conception, which I call pure epistemic proceduralism, does not depend on procedure-independent standards for good outcomes and relies on a proceduralist epistemology. It identifies a democratic decision as legitimate if it is the outcome of a process that satisfies certain conditions of political and epistemic fairness. My argument starts with a rejection of instrumentalism–the view that political equality is only instrumentally valuable. I reject instrumentalism on two grounds: (i) because it fails to respect reasonable value pluralism and to recognize the constitutive role of democratic procedures for legitimacy in pluralist societies, and (ii) because it neglects the constructive function of democratic decision-making. I then consider two alternatives to pure epistemic proceduralism: David Estlund's version of epistemic proceduralism and a Deweyan account of epistemic democracy. I argue that only pure epistemic proceduralism can make good on both shortcomings of instrumentalism, whereas each of the other two approaches only makes good on one and neglects the other.
Keywords epistemic democracy  democratic legitimacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/epi.0.0024
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy.Michael Hannon - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
The Ideal and Reality of Epistemic Proceduralism.James Gledhill - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal of Royal Assent.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2):379-400.
Values in Pure and Applied Science.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):257-268.
Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals.Annabelle Lever - 2015 - Law, Culture and the Humanities 11 (2).
Discourse and Procedural Ethics.Simone Evelyn Chambers - 1990 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice?Emanuela Ceva - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):183-200.
Epistemic Coherentism and the Isolation Objection.Paul K. Moser - 1986 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 27 (1):83-99.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
796 ( #4,286 of 2,285,919 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #12,962 of 2,285,919 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature