Pure Epistemic Proceduralism

Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):33-55 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I defend a pure proceduralist conception of legitimacy that applies to epistemic democracy. This conception, which I call pure epistemic proceduralism, does not depend on procedure-independent standards for good outcomes and relies on a proceduralist epistemology. It identifies a democratic decision as legitimate if it is the outcome of a process that satisfies certain conditions of political and epistemic fairness. My argument starts with a rejection of instrumentalism–the view that political equality is only instrumentally valuable. I reject instrumentalism on two grounds: (i) because it fails to respect reasonable value pluralism and to recognize the constitutive role of democratic procedures for legitimacy in pluralist societies, and (ii) because it neglects the constructive function of democratic decision-making. I then consider two alternatives to pure epistemic proceduralism: David Estlund's version of epistemic proceduralism and a Deweyan account of epistemic democracy. I argue that only pure epistemic proceduralism can make good on both shortcomings of instrumentalism, whereas each of the other two approaches only makes good on one and neglects the other.

Similar books and articles

Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Why pure proceduralism doesn’t remove the individual responsbility to make right economic judgments.Alice el-Wakil - 2013 - In Alice el-Wakil, Helena Röcklingsberg & Pers Sandin (eds.). pp. 127-132.
The ideal and reality of epistemic proceduralism.James Gledhill - 2015 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal of Royal Assent.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2):379-400.
Values in pure and applied science.Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):257-268.
privacy and democracy: what the secret ballot reveals.Annabelle Lever - 2015 - Law, Culture and the Humanities 11 (2).
Discourse and Procedural Ethics.Simone Evelyn Chambers - 1990 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant About Justice?Emanuela Ceva - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2):183-200.
Epistemic Coherentism and the Isolation Objection.Paul K. Moser - 1986 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 27 (1):83-99.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,514 (#7,099)

6 months
202 (#13,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabienne Peter
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy.Michael Hannon - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (3):591-611.
What is democratic reliability? Epistemic theories of democracy and the problem of reasonable disagreement.Felix Gerlsbeck - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):218-241.

View all 31 citations / Add more citations