Should Neuroscience Inform Judgements of Decision-Making Capacity?

Neuroethics:1-19 (forthcoming)
Abstract
In this article, I present an argument that suggests neuroscience should inform judgments of decision-making capacity. First, I review key behavioral and neurocognitive data to demonstrate that neuroscientific tests might be predictive of decision-making capacity, and that these tests might inform clinical judgments of capacity. Second, I argue that, consistent with the principles of autonomy and justice, such data should inform judgements of decision-making capacity. While the neuroscience of decision-making capacity still requires time to mature, there is strong reason to believe that neuroscience might assist clinicians in adjudicating difficult cases in the future. This article focuses on the assessment of capacity in brain injury patients who have profound communication impairments, however, the overarching aim of the article is to highlight the potential use of neuroscience to improve our understanding of the relationship between cognition and decision-making capacity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-018-9369-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,898
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mosaic Decisionmaking and Reemergent Agency After Severe Brain Injury.J. Fins Joseph - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-12.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Decision-Making Capacity and Unusual Beliefs: Two Contentious Cases.Brent Hyslop - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (3):439-444.
Interactive Capacity, Decisional Capacity, and a Dilemma for Surrogates.Vanessa Carbonell - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (4):36-37.
Decision Making Capacity Should Not Be Decisive in Emergencies.Dieneke Hubbeling - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):229-238.
Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.Peter Lucas - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-09

Total downloads
10 ( #530,170 of 2,293,852 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #108,257 of 2,293,852 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature