British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):279-294 (2011)
Pictures let us see what is not there. Or rather, since what pictures depict is not really there, we do not really see the things they are pictures of. Ever since Richard Wollheim introduced the notion of seeing-in into philosophical aesthetics, as part of his theory of depiction, there has been a lively debate about how, precisely, to understand this experience. However, one (alleged) feature of seeing-in that Wollheim pointed to has been almost completely absent in the subsequent discussion, namely that seeing-in allows for non-localization. When looking at a picture, Wollheim says, there is not always an answer to the question of where one sees a certain thing in a picture. If Wollheim is right in this, pictures indeed let us see what is not there: we see things in pictures, but there is no ‘there’ where we see those things. In this paper I argue against Wollheim's claim that object-seeing-in allows for non-localization. But there is, I argue, a pictorial experience, which is closely tied to seeing-in and which is non-localized, namely (what I call) pictorial perceptual presence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Mental Imagery and the Varieties of Amodal Perception.Robert Briscoe - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):153-173.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing?Bence Nanay - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
The Spectator in the Picture.Robert Hopkins - 2001 - In Rob Van Gerwen (ed.), Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting. Art as Representation and Expression. Cambridge University Press. pp. 215-231.
Representation without background? A critical reading of Wollheim and Greenberg on the representational character of abstract pictures.Elisa Caldarola - 2012 - Aisthesis. Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 5 (2).
Factive Pictorial Experience: What's Special About Photographs?Robert Hopkins - 2012 - Noûs 46 (4):709-731.
Anti-Pornography.Bence Nanay - 2012 - In Hans Maes & Jerrold Levinson (eds.), Art and Pornography. Oxford University Press.
Pictures, Pictorial Contents and Vision.Dominic Gregory - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):15-32.
What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?Richard Wollheim - 2003 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):131–147.
Why the Pictorial Relation is Not Reference.Alon Chasid - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):226-247.
Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance.Robert Hopkins - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press.
Perspective, Convention and Compromise.Robert Hopkins - 2003 - In Heiko Hecht, Margaret Atherton & Robert Schwartz (eds.), Looking Into Pictures: an interdisciplinary approach to pictorial space. MIT Press. pp. 145-165.
Pictorial Metaphors: A Reply to Sedivy.John Michael McGuire - 1999 - Metaphor and Symbol 14 (4):293-302.
Pictures in the Flesh Presence and Appearance in Pictorial Experience.J. Dokic - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (4):391-405.
Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting: Art as Representation and Expression.Richard Wollheim - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-07-13
Total downloads55 ( #94,668 of 2,164,236 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,084 of 2,164,236 )
How can I increase my downloads?