Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373-387 (2007)

Fabienne Peter
University of Warwick
Political egalitarianism is at the core of most normative conceptions of democratic legitimacy. It finds its minimal expression in the "one person one vote" formula. In the literature on deliberative democracy, political equality is typically interpreted in a more demanding sense, but different interpretations of what political equality requires can be identified. In this paper I shall argue that the attempt to specify political equality in deliberative democracy is affected by a dilemma. I shall illustrate the political egalitarian's dilemma by a hypothetical choice between two informational bases for political equality: Rawlsian primary goods and Amartya Sen's capability approach. The political egalitarian's dilemma reveals a clash between the requirement of ensuring equal possibilities to participate in the democratic process and the requirement of subjecting substantive judgments to deliberative evaluation. As such, the dilemma is a variant of the procedure vs. substance dilemma that is well-known in democratic theory. While it has sometimes been argued that deliberative democracy solves the tension between procedure and substance, the political egalitarian's dilemma shows that this tension continues within deliberative democracy.
Keywords Philosophy   Ontology   Political Philosophy   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-006-9057-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,217
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
On Liberty and Other Essays.John Stuart Mill (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann - 1996 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fragments of Equality in Representative Politics.Michael Saward - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (3):245-262.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Keeping It Open: Ontology, Ethics, Knowledge and Radical Democracy.A. Kioupkiolis - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (6):691-708.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
The Situational Context on the Nature of Political Philosophy.Yoram Levy - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (5):535-556.
An Alternative Model of Political Reasoning.F. M. Frohock - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (1):27-64.
Backing Away From Equality.Steven Wall - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):96-105.
Secularism, Equality, and Political Legitimacy.Jon Mahoney - 2010 - Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (1):17-30.
The Real Value of Equality.Robert Jubb - forthcoming - Journal of Politics.
Agency and Surprise: Learning at the Limits of Empathic‐Imagination and Liberal Egalitarian Political Philosophy.Steven R. Smith - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):25-40.


Added to PP index

Total views
87 ( #105,008 of 2,324,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #136,981 of 2,324,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes