In my paper “Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection,” published in the previous issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, I set out to determine whether a plausible argument could be constructed in support of a common intuition about the ethics of sex selection. The intuition in question is that sex selection for nonmedical reasons is incompatible with a proper parental love: that is, with the sort of love that a parent ought to have for her child or, equivalently, with the sort of love that someone accurately describable as a good parent will have for her child. I concluded that there is a prima facie compelling argument that fits the bill, though I did little more than introduce and set that argument out. In the current paper, my aim will be to subject it to closer scrutiny, by considering a number of possible objections to it. I will start by asking why the argument should be thought to apply only to sex selection for nonmedical reasons and not to cases in which selection is employed in order to prevent the birth of children with serious sex-linked genetic conditions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180107070570
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Efficiency, Responsibility and Disability.Stephen John - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):3-22.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parental Love and the Ethics of Sex Selection.Peter Herissone-Kelly - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (3):326-335.


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #153,334 of 2,326,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes