Mark Phelan
Lawrence University
Sally and Sid have worked together for a while, and Sally knows Sid to be a hard worker. She might make this point about him by saying, “Sid is a hard worker.” Or, she might make it by saying, “Sid is a Sherman tank.” We all recognize that there is some distinction between the first assertion, in which Sally is speaking literally, and the second, in which she is speaking figuratively. This is a distinction that any theory of figurative language worth its salt should capture. But, as I will argue, it is a distinction that contemporary accounts of figurative language fail to successfully explain. This is because such theories have been mostly concerned to explore the nature of figurative understanding and the status of figurative meanings. Perhaps proponents of these theories suppose that, by appealing to a special kind of figurative meaning, we can eventually explain the difference between speaking literally and speaking figuratively. I believe this approach gets the order of explanation backwards. I contend that accounts of figurative meaning and understanding can only be fully articulated against a prior account of the distinction between figurative and literal language. What’s more, once my account of figurative language is in place, we can begin to see why people bother speaking figuratively at all, or so I will argue.
Keywords Figurative  Literal  Metaphor  Contextualism  Speech Acts
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metaphor.Richard Moran - 1997 - In Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Blackwell. pp. 248-267.
Figurative Speech and Figurative Acts.Ted Cohen - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):669-684.
Aquinas on Scriptural Metaphor and Allegory.Alexander J. Doherty - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:183-192.
Truthfulness and Relevance.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - Mind 111 (443):583-632.
Logic and Metaphor.James Gasser - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):227-238.
Literal and Figurative Language of God.John H. Whittaker - 1981 - Religious Studies 17 (1):39 - 54.
The Inadequacy of Paraphrase is the Dogma of Metaphor.Mark Phelan - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):481-506.
The Literal and the Figurative.Hugh Bredin - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (259):69 - 80.
Metaphor in the Mind: The Cognition of Metaphor.Elisabeth Camp - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):154-170.


Added to PP index

Total views
109 ( #97,480 of 2,444,934 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,444,934 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes