A Living Wage for Research Subjects

Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):243-253 (2011)
Offering cash payments to research subjects is a common recruiting method, but this practice continues to be controversial because of its potential to compromise the protection of human subjects. Federal regulations and guidelines currently allow researchers to pay subjects for participation, but they say very little about how much researchers can pay their subjects. This paper argues that the federal regulations and guidelines should implement a standard payment formula. It argues for a wage payment model, and critically examines three candidates for a base wage: the nonfarm production wage, the FLSA minimum wage, and a living wage. After showing that the nonfarm production wage is too high to satisfy ethical criteria, and the minimum wage is too low, this paper concludes that the wage payment model with a base wage equivalent to a living wage is the best candidate for a standard payment formula in human subjects research
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00593.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.
Research Exceptionalism.James Wilson & David Hunter - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):45-54.
Payment for Research Participation: A Coercive Offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials.Nancy M. P. King - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28 (4):332-343.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Research Subject as Wage Earner.James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.
The Ethics and Economics of the Minimum Wage.T. M. Wilkinson - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):351-374.
Living Wages and Institutional Supply Chain Duties.Philippa Smales - 2010 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):109-134.
Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys.E. Wendling Amy - 2007 - Radical Philosophy Today 2007:49-67.
Voluntary Losses and Wage Compensation.Simon Wigley - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):363-376.
Sweatshops and Respect for Persons.Norman E. Bowie - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):221-242.
Prospering with the Living Wage.Kathleen Haley - 2000 - Business Ethics 14 (5):6-6.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

20 ( #247,325 of 2,169,122 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,573 of 2,169,122 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums