Approximate syllogisms – on the logic of everyday life

Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):227-234 (1999)
Abstract
Since Aristotle it is recognised that a valid syllogism cannot have two particular premises. However, that is not how a lay person sees it; at least as long as the premises read many, most etc, instead of a plain some. The lay people are right if one considers that these syllogisms do not have strict but approximate (Zadeh) validity. Typically there are only particular premises available in everyday life and one is dependent on such syllogisms. – Some rules on the usage of particular premises are given below.
Keywords approximate reasoning  fuzzy logic  possible worlds  syllogisms with particular premises  undetermined quantifiers
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1008369608852
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Legal Concepts as Inferential Nodes and Ontological Categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

45 ( #112,840 of 2,153,830 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums