The Ruffin Series of the Society for Business Ethics 2004:235-238 (2004)
There are explicit claims to Darwinian thinking in numerous fields of study. A common temptation associated with this method across disciplines is to call some attributes “natural” and others “cultural” in origin. But this distinction can be dangerous—particularly when applied to ethics. When employing the Darwinian method, ideas should be evaluated in the same way whether the characteristics are described as natural or as cultural. We should ascertain the moral usefulness of a trait irrespective of its genetic basis or lack thereof. The nature/culture distinction is irrelevant to ethics. If Darwinian thinking connotes or implies an important difference, it is a dangerous idea to moral theory. I don’t believe the method denotes such a distinction, and in fact helps ethicists ask and answer many interesting questions that would not have arisen without it. But great care should be taken
|Keywords||Business and Professional Ethics Conference Proceedings|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
An Evolutionary Account of Chronic Pain: Integrating the Natural Method in Evolutionary Psychology.Kenneth J. Sufka & Derek D. Turner - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (2):243-257.
Moral Judgments and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Jennifer McCrickerd - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:423-433.
The Philosophical Method of the Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and its Application to the Ethics.Frank Lucash - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 7 (3):311-322.
Natural Law, Skepticism, and Methods of Ethics.J. B. Schneewind - 1991 - Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (2):289-308.
Evolution, Society, and Ethics: Social Darwinism Versus Evolutionary Ethics.Christine Clavien - forthcoming - In Thomas Heams (ed.), Handbook of Evolutionary Biology (provis. Title). Springer.
On a Functional-Morphological Approach to Phylogenetic Reconstruction: A Critique.Ronald Sluys - 1983 - Acta Biotheoretica 32 (1):29-41.
Realism, Method and Truth.Howard Sankey - 2002 - In Michele Marsonet (ed.), The Problem of Realism. Ashgate. pp. 64.
Elimination, Correction and Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.James Blachowicz - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):5 – 17.
Kant's Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction Between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses.Gabriele Gava - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):728-749.
Ethical Case Deliberation on the Ward. A Comparison of Four Methods.Norbert Steinkamp & Bert Gordijn - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):235-246.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads27 ( #190,161 of 2,171,970 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,902 of 2,171,970 )
How can I increase my downloads?