Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95 (2003)
This essay outlines some of the main issues that arise in the theory of freedom and, in particular, those that divide the liberal conception of freedom as non-interference from the republican conception of freedom as non-domination. It goes on to explore the idea that discourse theory provides reasons for favouring the republican conception. Discourse theory is taken for these purposes to be a theory that subsumes, but goes beyond decision theory. It accepts the decision-theoretic view that human agents are moved by beliefs and desires that, on the whole, are rationally maintained and rationally issued in action. But it adds the further, crucial assumption that human beliefs and desires are shaped under the transformative influence of discursive argument and exchange
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Republican Moments in Political Liberalism.Anthony Simon Laden - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):217-237.
Republicanism and Democratic Injustice.Henry S. Richardson - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):175-200.
The Impossibility of a Paretian Republican? Some Comments on Pettit and Sen.Christian List - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (1):65-87.
Republican Freedom, Rights, and the Coalition Problem.K. Dowding - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):301-322.
A Note on List's Modal Logic of Republican Freedom.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):341-349.
Nondomination and Normativity.By Christopher Mcmahon - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):319–327.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads30 ( #172,911 of 2,177,978 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,489 of 2,177,978 )
How can I increase my downloads?