How are we to interpret Heidegger's oeuvre? A methodological manifesto

One may have different objectives in interpreting texts. If a judge interprets a statute in order to obtain a satisfactory solution to a case, his aim may be called “applicative”. But if a historian of science wants to reconstruct the meaning of obscure passages of Ptolemy’s “Hypotheses planetarum”, his objectives are purely historical and theoretical.The paper argues that these different aims, applicative and historical ones, require different methodologies of interpretation, and imply different criteria of success. In particular, the “principle of charity” according to which an interpretation is better to the extent that we agree more with what the text as interpreted says, is fitting for applicative interpretations, but not without further qualifications for historical ones.The paper argues further that we should apply the methodology of historical interpretation to the entire body of German texts now available, if we want to interpret Martin Heidegger’s philosophical oeuvre, assess its philosophical value, and investigate its links to Nazism. These were the aims of Herman Philipse’s book “Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. A Critical Interpretation” . Criticisms of this book by Taylor Carman and others are often off target because they presuppose applicative interpretations that aim at making Heidegger say things the interpreter believes himself, instead of striving for historical adequacy, and that are based upon a small selection of translations instead of upon the entire corpus of extant German texts
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00126.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,636
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Heidegger on Presence: A Reply.Frederick A. Olafson - 1996 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (3 & 4):421 – 426.
Modes of Interpretation and Interpretative Constraints.Stein Haugom Olsen - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):135-148.
Space, Place, and Sculpture: Working with Heidegger. [REVIEW]Paul Crowther - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):151-170.
Heidegger Teaching: An Analysis and Interpretation of Pedagogy.Dawn C. Riley - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (8):797-815.
Heidegger's Concept of Presence.Taylor Carman - 1995 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):431 – 453.
Tragedy and Truth in Heidegger and Jaspers.Jennifer Anna Gosetti - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):301-314.
On Making Sense (and Nonsense) of Heidegger.Taylor Carman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):561-572.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

58 ( #90,431 of 2,169,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,568 of 2,169,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums