More on benchmarks of fairness: Response to Ballantyne

Bioethics 26 (1):49-56 (2012)

Trisha Phillips
Mississippi State University
This paper challenges the fitness of Angela Ballantyne's proposed theory of exploitation by situating her ‘fair risk account’ in an ongoing dialogue about the adequacy conditions for benchmarks of fairness. It identifies four adequacy conditions: (1) the ability to focus on level rather than type of benefit; (2) the ability to focus on micro-level rather than macro-level fairness; (3) the ability to prevent discrimination based on need; and (4) the ability to prescribe a certain distribution as superior to all others. While the fair risk account satisfies the first condition, this paper argues that it has difficulty satisfying the last three conditions. Ballantyne's proposal includes several new and promising features, but in order for the fair risk account to be useful in identifying and preventing exploitation, Ballantyne must either clarify and augment her theory or challenge the relevance of the adequacy conditions it fails to meet
Keywords social justice  risk assessment  international research  research ethics  exploitation  benefit assesment  fairness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01822.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,305
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
29 ( #311,430 of 2,280,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #308,196 of 2,280,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature