Cognitive Science 46 (2):e13089 (2022)

Ben Phillips
Arizona State University
A puzzling feature of paradigmatic cases of dehumanization is that the perpetrators often attribute uniquely human traits to their victims. This has become known as the “paradox of dehumanization.” We address the paradox by arguing that the perpetrators think of their victims as human in one sense, while denying that they are human in another sense. We do so by providing evidence that people harbor a dual character concept of humanity. Research has found that dual character concepts have two independent sets of criteria for their application, one of which is descriptive and one of which is normative. Across four experiments, we found evidence that people deploy a descriptive criterion according to which being human is a matter of being a Homo sapiens; as well as a normative criterion according to which being human is a matter of possessing a deep-seated commitment to do the morally right thing. Importantly, we found that people are willing to affirm that someone is human in the descriptive sense, while denying that they are human in the normative sense, and vice versa. In addition to providing a solution to the paradox of dehumanization, these findings suggest that perceptions of moral character have a central role to play in driving dehumanization.
Keywords Dehumanization  Dual character concepts  The paradox of dehumanization  The true self
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.13089
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Essential Moral Self.Nina Strohminger & Shaun Nichols - 2014 - Cognition 131 (1):159-171.
Water is and is Not H 2 O.Kevin P. Tobia, George E. Newman & Joshua Knobe - 2020 - Mind and Language 35 (2):183-208.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

If Everything is Dehumanization, Then Nothing Is.Paul Bloom - 2022 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26 (7):539.
Dehumanization: Trends, Insights, and Challenges.Nour S. Kteily & Alexander P. Landry - 2022 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26 (3):222-240.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peirce, Moral Cognitivism, and the Development of Character. Massecar - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (1):139.
Dual Character Concepts.Kevin Reuter - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (1):e12557.
The Importance of Moral Character.Nancy Ellen Schauber - 1993 - Dissertation, Yale University
Character and Autonomy: The Paradox of Moral Education.Michael Reed Taylor - 1982 - Dissertation, The Florida State University
Moral Relativism in Context.James R. Beebe - 2010 - Noûs 44 (4):691-724.
Intuition and Belief in Moral Motivation.Antti Kauppinen - 2015 - In Gunnar Björnsson (ed.), Moral Internalism. Oxford University Press.
Some Varieties of Particularism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (1&2):1-12.
The No Reason Thesis.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1989 - Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (1):1.
Ethical Knowledge?Craig Thomas Perdue - 1994 - Dissertation, Wayne State University


Added to PP index

Total views
274 ( #40,036 of 2,518,587 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
127 ( #5,195 of 2,518,587 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes